Christianity, Homosexuality and Ex-Gay Programs. My Opinion.

Comments

[this is good]

Chezza, normally when I see that a bog is this long, I don't read it, I skim a little here and there and move on. Your bog embrassed me with all the quotes from the bible and your logic over powered me. All you've written so well, is exactually how I feel. It is so illogical to me that Christ would have condemned gays for living a life loving their mates. Christ was all about love and tolerence not hate and bigotry.

I have several gay friends some male and some female and I feel for them as they struggle to be in this very anti-gay environment. In Dancing Bear's blog this week he spoke of the mean and hateful words spoken by the new Pope, against gay marriage. Bear speculates that the Pope is a closet homosexual. We have read recent headlines of Christian leadership and US Senators engaged in homosexual relationships.

One thing that I don't believe you mentioned is that some people, I'd say mostly men, come out against gays because they want to have others believe that their protest prove they aren't gay.

The whole anit-gay movement is so sad and such a misplaced use of time and energy. Christ preached love, peace and tolerence, today our religions preach, hate, war and bigotry...hmm I think if Christ back back to this world he would be very disappointed.

Thank you. I know that long posts can be rather off putting, so I understand why people don't take the time to read them.

As a coincidence I was just reading what the Pope had to say recently and I was thinking well it seems I have to make an addition to my post. I will be totally honest, I am fuming about what the Pope has said. There is no way that committed gay relationships are a danger to world peace, what an totally absurd thing to say and yes extremely hateful. He should listen to his own words:

"If the world wanted to live in peace, it would need to recognize those universal values that all people share as part of a single, "human family".

He actually got this part right, the unfortunate part is that he doesn't include LGBT people in his "human family", well if he does he has a strange way of showing it!

http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSL0162664620080101

One thing that I don't believe you mentioned is that some people, I'd say mostly men, come out against gays because they want to have others believe that their protest prove they aren't gay

Yes ye who protests the most has the most to hide - I agree this is quite often the case in many different situations.

If Christ came back today I would hope he would be disappointed otherwise I would be disappointed.

Thanks heaps for the positive comment.







[this is good]
Thanks for the highly interesting post, Chezz:)

hmmm...

IMO, the bible is a wee bit out-dated...

and why the heck can't people let other people just live their lives

REALLY!
You are so correct Chezza and thanks for taking the time to write such an informative post!
Thanks.

Yeah I know..........

*Huge sigh*

and why the heck can't people let other people just live their lives

REALLY!

Says it all, doesn't it.


Live and let live.
[this is good]
Oh Chezza,

You say it all so well, thank you !!

I would just like to add to the gay argument, the bible says love thy neighbour !
I don't ask straight people what they do in their bedroom and I am sure some would shock me, but that is their choice.

What I do in mine is my choice, it doesn't change my desire to treat people with respect and live my life by morals I hold dearly.

I just love another who happens to be the same sex as I.

As for this .. and is caused by a mother who was close, controlling and overbearing; they quote a figure of this occurring in 87% of gay people....

This argument is just as stupid as saying I have a choice..why would I chose to be different, to have my love belittled all my life and live a life that is considered immoral and deviant...

Thank You again Chezza for your understanding and tolerance and desire to show that gays are just as normal as heterosexuals are.
[this is good]

I just saw you posted this on Facebook and thought I'd have a bit of a read. It is an intresting debate.

First of all I agree with you on the point that Christans can't pick and choose which bits of the Old Testament (or Jewish Law) they can follow. In fact they don't have to pick or choose. As a general rule, if we see a Christian write saying to keep it up, then do so, if not or they reject it (as with circumcision etc) then leave it. Much of the Old Testament Law exists to show Christians just how much harder life would be without Jesus. (PS you left out Sodom and Gomorrah).

Also that you have highlighted, the Bible only deals with sexual acts, not orientation and that they are a very small component of the overall work. Cultural priorites have changed, however, we are a very sexualised society now. So if God had waited until now to reveal his wisdom, it might have been covered a bit more extensivly and prescriptively although that's not to say that what is covered is any way incomplete for what we need to live a holy life.

Also as a feminist (but also a Christian) I take issue with leaning too heavily on Old Testament ideas as women are little better than property - a reflection on the society at the time rather than God, fortuantely.

Additionally, it's important to note that guidance regarding behaivour in the New Testament is for Christians only. It can not be applied to those outside the chruch - so a Christian who openly condemns or discriminates against an openly gay person who does not claim to be a Christian, is in fact sinning. And God doesn't say one sin is better or worse than another, they all seprate us from him.

I have to say, I have a tendancy to side with Paul, in many cases he just articulated better or elaborated on what Christ had already taught. And if we look at the example of Jesus, he was in fact single. Not all of us are cut out for that sort of life, so Paul does make some concession, and in Timothy actually encourages widows to marry again so that they are not reliant on the church. But those who identify as Christian, do have to make a commitment to follow the beliefs that come with the territory, regardless of social changes. And some of them do suck and completely go against our human nature - but the decision should be made remembering that it's just for the short time we're on earth, compared to eternity in the after life.

As for the quotes from the APA, it is interesting to note that until recently homosexuality was treated not only as a mental illness, but was also illegal. One of my favourite authors, Oscar Wilde, was imprisoned for consentual homosexual acts just over 100 years ago (not too long in the scheme of things). But any minister or any one claiming to be Christian who relies on secular thinking and treatment to help some one probably needs to be beaten over the head with a Bible until some of it sinks in. They should know very well that they should be relying on Christ to change people, not their own actions and not treatment from any doctors or psychologists or the like!

Anyhow, that was long, I should go and do my own rant.

[this is good]
Thank you. That's all. Just thank you. :)

Funny how churches are so selective in the causes they crusade for, from within their own book. Personally, I'd say enforce it all, or none. The 10 commandments came directly from God (so they love to say) but then even God himself didn't bother to say anything about homosexuals in them, did he?

I really couldn't care less how people did things 2000 + years ago, as ignorant as most people really were at that time.

However, I must disagree with some of the discussion you had with WPG... It is absolutely wrong to assume that everyone who protests hard for their belief is actually hiding something. -Like the Pope being against gay marrage instantly makes him a closet fag. That's a stupid, ignorant and childish thing to say about someone merely because they believe differently.

The biggest problem I see with gay marrage is that divorce courts are full enough as it is. Allowing gay marrages would do nothing but further clog up our already overburdened court system with more frivilous spur-of-the-moment marrages and divorces.

I'm not gay, but I'm also neither pro or anti gay. Personally, this world is so pitifully short on love that all I could say is grab whatever love you can find, and hang on tight.

[this is good]
I'm a Deist, not a Christian, so I won't carry on too much on the interpretation of you scriptures, beyond saying that my own Bible studies tend to agree with yours. I just never got that telling other people how to live their lives was nearly as important a part of Christ's message as how we live our own.

As to the last comment:

The biggest problem I see with gay marrage is that divorce courts are full enough as it is. Allowing gay marrages would do nothing but further clog up our already overburdened court system with more frivilous spur-of-the-moment marrages and divorces.

Perhaps if we heterosexuals concentrated more on not marrying badly, and upon actually holding up the vows we make when we do marry than telling the gays how to live their lives, we could unclog the courts and repair family values enough that we wouldn't notice any hypothetical harm they would do with the rights we reserve to ourselves (or being a citizen of the Commonwealth of of Massachusetts, than we used to reserve).

Surely there's something here and there in Scripture that advises us on how to marry better that would be applicable. Again we're back to that notion that Jesus was speaking to us about how we live our lives more than how we should upbraid others for theirs.

Brons