Christianity, Homosexuality and Ex-Gay Programs. My Opinion.
Quite often I find being a Christian tough. Not because I have a lot of trouble with most of the ‘Commandments’ but more to do with what I see as hurtful acts that are done in the name of Christianity and to me these acts fly in the face of everything I believe in. One of the biggest struggles I have is the Christian churches response to homosexuality. According to many the Bible states that being or at least the act of homosexuality is an abomination. There is much debate over whether this is in fact what the Bible says and the translation you believe will essentially depend on how you view homosexuality.
Throughout the entire Bible it seems that there are only a small number of references to ‘homosexual activity’.
It must be noted that there is no term that means homosexual orientation in the original Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek texts of the Bible. The authors of the Bible did not understand sexual orientation and thus did not write about it. Biblical authors had little or no understanding of same-sex committed relationships. Rather, they assumed that everyone was heterosexual, but that some heterosexuals engaged in sex with persons of the same gender. Thus, when you see one of these words in an English translation of the Bible, it is important to dig deeper and find what the original Hebrew or Greek text really means. It also indicates that the Bible is most likely not an authoritative text when it comes to same-sex committed relationships. The term homosexual was coined in the late 1800s when human sexuality first became studied as a science.
The most often quoted scriptures are:
Gn 19:1-11 (Destruction of Sodom - see comments section for analysis)
Lev 20:13 KJV: If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
1 Cor 6:9-10. KJV: Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
1 Tim
1:9-10. KJV: Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but
for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy
and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers,
For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for
menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing
that is contrary to sound doctrine
Rom
1:26-27 KJV: For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even
their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And
likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their
lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and
receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
Rom 1:26-27 NIV: Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.
The Leviticus quote gets plenty of use in the anti-homosexual cause, possibly because of the abomination word as it is a very strong word and good for the cause against homosexuality. Wow imagine being an abomination! Plus the penalty for such an action; it is very harsh indeed. But just to put it into some context here are some other actions/consequences that seem most strange or barbaric in our modern times:
Cursing your parents
Leviticus 21: 9 NIV: If anyone curses his father or mother, he must be put to death. He has cursed his father or his mother, and his blood will be on his own head.
Adultery
Leviticus 21: 10 NIV: If a man commits adultery with another man's wife—with the wife of his neighbor—both the adulterer and the adulteress must be put to death.
Restitution
Leviticus 24: 19-20 NIV: If anyone injures his neighbor, whatever he has done must be done to him: fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth. As he has injured the other, so he is to be injured.
Eating shellfish and animals that are an abomination.
Leviticus 11: 9-19 KJV: These shall ye eat of all that are in the waters: whatsoever hath fins and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them shall ye eat. And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you: They shall be even an abomination unto you; ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye shall have their carcases in abomination. Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters that shall be an abomination unto you. And these are they which ye shall have in abomination among the fowls; they shall not be eaten, they are an abomination: the eagle, and the ossifrage, and the ospray, And the vulture, and the kite after his kind; Every raven after his kind; And the owl, and the night hawk, and the cuckow, and the hawk after his kind, And the little owl, and the cormorant, and the great owl, And the swan, and the pelican, and the gier eagle, And the stork, the heron after her kind, and the lapwing, and the bat.
So don’t worry if you are an abomination, as you are not alone even shellfish are an abomination, as are some very beautiful birds, as are many other animals as the list just goes on and on ……..
Childbirth
Leviticus 12: 1-5 NIV: The LORD said to Moses, "Say to the Israelites: 'A woman who becomes pregnant and gives birth to a son will be ceremonially unclean for seven days, just as she is unclean during her monthly period. On the eighth day the boy is to be circumcised. Then the woman must wait thirty-three days to be purified from her bleeding. She must not touch anything sacred or go to the sanctuary until the days of her purification are over. If she gives birth to a daughter, for two weeks the woman will be unclean, as during her period. Then she must wait sixty-six days to be purified from her bleeding.
If you are a woman you are obviously better to give birth to a boy instead of a girl, because then you won’t be as unclean for as long.
Some Miscellaneous quotes
Leviticus 19: 19 NIV: Do not wear clothing woven of two kinds of material. Deuteronomy 21:11 Do not wear clothes of wool and linen woven together.
Leviticus 19: 26 NIV: Do not eat any meat with the blood still in it I guess don’t order a steak cooked rare from now on..
Leviticus 19: 27 NIV: Do not cut the hair at the sides of your head or clip off the edges of your beard.
How to get out of war service
Deuteronomy 20: 6-9. Has anyone planted a vineyard and not begun to enjoy it? Let him go home, or he may die in battle and someone else enjoy it. Has anyone become pledged to a woman and not married her? Let him go home, or he may die in battle and someone else marry her." Then the officers shall add, "Is any man afraid or fainthearted? Let him go home so that his brothers will not become disheartened too." When the officers have finished speaking to the army, they shall appoint commanders over it
Deuteronomy 24: 5. If a man has recently married, he must not be sent to war or have any other duty laid on him. For one year he is to be free to stay at home and bring happiness to the wife he has married.
Actions in war.
Deuteronomy 20:10- 15. When you march up to attack a city, make its people an offer of peace. If they accept and open their gates, all the people in it shall be subject to forced labor and shall work for you. If they refuse to make peace and they engage you in battle, lay siege to that city. When the LORD your God delivers it into your hand, put to the sword all the men in it. As for the women, the children, the livestock and everything else in the city, you may take these as plunder for yourselves. And you may use the plunder the LORD your God gives you from your enemies. This is how you are to treat all the cities that are at a distance from you and do not belong to the nations nearby.
Tough Love
Deuteronomy 21:18- 21. If a man has a stubborn and rebellious son who does not obey his father and mother and will not listen to them when they discipline him, his father and mother shall take hold of him and bring him to the elders at the gate of his town. They shall say to the elders, "This son of ours is stubborn and rebellious. He will not obey us. He is a profligate and a drunkard." Then all the men of his town shall stone him to death.
Watch where you put your hands. I wonder if this applies to male athletes?
Deuteronomy 25:11. If two men are fighting and the wife of one of them comes to rescue her husband from his assailant, and she reaches out and seizes him by his private parts, you shall cut off her hand. Show her no pity.
In total there are 613 Commandments (mitzvoth) in the Old Testament. In modern times these are considered Jewish laws. Many of these 613 mitzvot cannot be observed at this time for various reasons. For example, a large portion of the laws relate to sacrifices and offerings, which can only be made in the Temple, and the Temple does not exist today. Some of the laws relate to the theocratic state of Israel, its king, its supreme court, and its system of justice, and cannot be observed because the theocratic state of Israel does not exist today. In addition, some laws do not apply to all people or places. Agricultural laws only apply within the state of Israel, and certain laws only apply to kohanim or Levites.
My point is that some where along the line as Christians ‘we’ have decided or the decision had been made for us which of the 613 Commandments we will follow and which we will not. So to quote Leviticus in terms of homosexuality in my opinion is irrelevant, because if we as Christians have decided not to follow certain Jewish practices because they don’t suit us, then I can’t logically see how we can quote Leviticus as a relevant text for Christians. But if you are not satisfied with my explanation then that is fine by me, you are quite welcome to hop on the rollercoaster ride of the translation of the Leviticus scripture. But I will not be. In my opinion the scripture in question is not perfectly clear in its translation.
Moving onto the other scripture references to homosexuality this time the New Testament
1 Cor
6:9-10. KJV: Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of
God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor
effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, Nor thieves, nor covetous,
nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of
God.
1 Tim
1:9-10. KJV: Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but
for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy
and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers,
For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for
menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing
that is contrary to sound doctrine
Rom
1:26-27 KJV: For this cause God gave
them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use
into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the
natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men
working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of
their error which was meet.
See the comments section of the next post for a more in depth discussion of this passage.
It should be noted that there was only a
single author of the last three scriptures they were written by the same
person, namely Paul. So we aren’t
actually hearing a different point of view, just the same one said by the same
person.
The last scripture Rom 1:26-27 is
interesting. It is referring to women and men who exchange natural relations
for unnatural ones. If we believe that
gay and lesbians do not have a choice when it comes to their sexual
orientation, then their natural inclination would be to be involved in a same
sex relationship and therefore they are not changing what is natural to
them.
In the other scriptures you can see it isn’t as if ‘homosexuals’ have been totally singled out, oh no they have the company of liars, thieves, cheats, lawbreakers, drunkards, the greedy and the slanderers etc, which probably includes all of us at some time or another.
So
let he who has never told a lie pass judgement otherwise it is best to keep quiet
if you intend to pass judgement on another.
Romans 2: 1-11. You, therefore, have no excuse, you who pass judgment on someone else, for at whatever point you judge the other, you are condemning yourself, because you who pass judgment do the same things. Now we know that God's judgment against those who do such things is based on truth. So when you, a mere man, pass judgment on them and yet do the same things, do you think you will escape God's judgment? Or do you show contempt for the riches of his kindness, tolerance and patience, not realizing that God's kindness leads you toward repentance?
But because of your stubbornness and your unrepentant heart, you are storing up wrath against yourself for the day of God's wrath, when his righteous judgment will be revealed. God "will give to each person according to what he has done." To those who by persistence in doing good seek glory, honor and immortality, he will give eternal life. But for those who are self-seeking and who reject the truth and follow evil, there will be wrath and anger. There will be trouble and distress for every human being who does evil: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile; but glory, honor and peace for everyone who does good: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile. For God does not show favoritism.
I find it interesting that there is so much emphasis placed on homosexuality out in the Christian world, whereas it doesn’t rate that much of a mention in the Bible compared to the amount of time spent debating about the subject. Jesus came down to Earth to teach us all how to live well, treat others well and be saved from our sins. In all the time he was on Earth he never once actually condemned/mentioned anyone committing a homosexual act. The only person who mentions ‘homosexuality’ (not by name as the term wasn’t coined until the 1800s) was Paul after Jesus had left this Earth.
Given I prefer to follow Jesus and I cannot find any evidence of him mentioning a problem with homosexuality, I will be standing up for the rights of people with a LGBT orientation.
Paul has an interesting take on marriage.
1 Corinthians 7:8-9. Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I am. But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion.
So where does that leave the LGBT person?
In my opinion and in many people’s opinions being LGBT is not a matter of choice.
·
[H]omosexuality
is not an illness. It does not require treatment and is not changeable.
American Psychological Association, Answers to Your Questions About Sexual
Orientation and Homosexuality, July 1998
· There is no published scientific evidence supporting the efficacy of “reparative therapy” as a treatment to change one’s sexual orientation... American Psychiatric Association, Statement, Dec. 11, 1998
· [We] oppose any psychiatric treatment, such as “reparative” or “conversion” therapy which is based upon the assumption that homosexuality per se is a mental disorder or based on the a priori assumption that the patient should change his/her homosexual orientation. American Medical Association, Resolution, 2000
· [I]t seems appropriate to understand sexual orientation (heterosexual or homosexual) as a deep-seated dimension of one’s personality and to recognize its relative stability in a person. Always Our Children: A Pastoral Message to Parents of Homosexual Children and Suggestions for Pastoral Ministers, NCCB Committee on Marriage and Family, Third Printing, Revised, June 1998
· The United States Catholic Conference (USCC) talks of “those persons for whom homosexuality is a permanent, seemingly irreversible sexual orientation." U.S. Catholic Conference, Human Sexuality: A Catholic Perspective for Education and Lifelong Learning, 1990, p.54-55
If it is not a choice then
why should LGBT people be condemned not to have the same rights as heterosexual
couple’s? I think it is an utter
disgrace in many countries that a married couple of one month can have more
rights than a loving gay couple of 20 years.
If we look at Paul’s passage above about single people, in his opinion
it is far better for them to marry than to burn with passion. So if being LGBT is not a choice, would it
not be better for them and society for LGBT people to be allowed to create a
loving legal marriage.
Instead the church seems to
believe that even though it may not be a case of choice, the only answer is for
some one who is LGBT to live a purely celibate life. This seems totally unfair if that person is
in a stable loving relationship and especially if that person would marry if
given the chance. To me it is a complete
injustice that two people who love each other are not permitted to have their
love publicly recognised in a legal marriage ceremony. What gives anyone the right to dictate as to
who should be celibate and who shouldn’t be?
If some one decides to have sex before marriage that should be their
business and I accept that it is not what the Christian church view is, but it
is not for me to enforce that view as that is between them and their God if
they have one. But in the case of a gay
couple the only choice they have according to the church is to be celibate due
to a legal marriage not being an option.
One thing I have learnt over
the past few years is that there is a seemingly high percentage of people belonging
to certain religions that it would not matter how much evidence was put in
front of them about certain issues, they would still prefer to say no the
evidence is wrong. So I know that if it
was possible to prove beyond a doubt that being of LGBT orientation was NOT a
choice, there would still be a large number of people who would say it makes no
difference.
It makes me sick that
certain ‘Christian’ organisations and Christians themselves have psychologically
hurt gay people and have even driven them to suicide.
It is disgraceful that there
are ‘Christian’ organisations taking advantage of gay people and trying to
change their sexual orientation and making them feel worse about themselves
than they may already do, not to mention taking large amounts of their money in
the process.
Quite frankly I think that
some of the people running these programs are actually sexual deviants and do
not have the best interests of the gay person in mind when they design these so
called ‘therapies’. Allegations include regularly measuring penis size and
having to report the results to the group; touching and holding each other and
even a weekend retreat totally naked with touching and feeling sessions with
complete strangers. There has also been
a criminal conviction against on ‘therapist’, Texas ex-gay therapist Chris
Austin was convicted of two counts of felony sexual assault on a patient. Austin was sentenced to 10 years in prison, but received seven
years probation, had to register as a sex offender and was ordered to pay a
$2,500 fine. He was finally convicted after years of reported abuse - including
several alleged victims who testified at the trial.
Do you know what this is?
“In
the name of Jesus Christ I say that this creative energy from now on shall flow
in its normal channel, and it shall not over-flow anymore to the right hand or
to the left hand. I build high dikes on
the right hand and on the left hand and in Jesus' name I command that it shall
not overflow to the left hand or the right hand, but it shall flow quietly in
its normal channel."
It is an anti-masturbation prayer., a rather bizarre prayer if you ask me The reason a gay man would recite this ‘prayer’
is because according to the Christian Ex-Gays, masturbation is a gateway to
"same-sex attraction" because "it is a form of sex with
yourself." Interesting connection,
I bet it is based on sound scientific research; I was being sarcastic by the
way.
Just warning any parents out there, if your
child turns out to be LGBT then it is your fault. Sexual brokenness, according to ex-gay doctrine,
usually occurs early in childhood, and is caused by a mother who was close,
controlling and overbearing; they quote a figure of this occurring in 87% of
gay people. Also in 100% of cases the
father/father figure was distant, uninvolved in their upbringing, frightening
and unapproachable. Parents also failed to instill masculinity in
their sons. Apparently “Focus on the Family” ex-gay lecturers routinely and
flatly declare that all gays and lesbians are victims of childhood sexual
abuse.
Reparative or sexual reorientation therapy,
as used by the ex-gay movement, has been discredited by virtually all major
American medical, psychiatric, psychological and professional counseling
organizations. The American Psychological Association, for instance, declared
in 2006: "There is simply no sufficiently scientifically sound evidence
that sexual orientation can be changed. Our further concern is that the
positions espoused by NARTH [the National
Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality] and Focus on the
Family create an environment in which prejudice and discrimination can
flourish." The powerful American Medical Association, for its part,
officially "opposes the use of 'reparative' or 'conversion' therapy that
is based on the assumption that homosexuality per se is a mental disorder or
based upon the a priori assumption that the patient should change his/her
homosexual orientation."
Many ex-gay proponents admit that total conversion to heterosexuality is at best an elusive goal. Frank Worthen, who runs the ex-gay residential program New Hope writes in his curriculum workbook Steps Out: "Our primary goal is not to make heterosexuals out of homosexual people. God alone determines whether a former homosexual person is to marry and rear a family, or if he (or she) is to remain celibate, serving the Lord with his whole heart."
Jim Burroway from Box
Turtle attended the Love Won Out conference. It seems the whole point of the Love Won Out
conferences, put on by Exodus International and Focus On the Family, is to
convince parents, loved ones, pastors, teachers, gays, and anyone else that
“change is possible.” They often do this without defining what change means,
and they often sugarcoat the likelihood of change for everyone. But if you’re
lucky enough to attend the right breakout session given by just the right
speaker, you just might catch the most honest assessment for the possibility of
change you will ever hear. A member of
the ex-gay organisation called Exodus'
admits to struggling with homosexuality every day of his life. "Every day,
I wake up and deny what comes naturally to me,"
Due to the damage these
groups are doing to gay people, there are now ex-gay survivor groups
emerging. Scott Tucker, was once a
member of an ex-gay organisation and is now openly gay, said that for years he
faulted himself for failing to turn straight until he realized the programs had
the opposite effect, isolating him in a "ghetto" of gay men trying to
become straight. Shawn O'Donnell, who
spent a decade in ex-gay ministries beginning when he was 15, said "I see
now that going through these ex-gay experiences caused harm in my life. I heard
the message loud and clear that I was a horrible person. I began cutting on
myself at such an early age because I just couldn't deal with the fact that I
was gay, I grew to hate myself and tried to take my life a few times." The founder of Love in Action told one former client, “It
would almost be better if you weren't alive than to return back to the life
that you have struggled so much to leave.”
In my opinion it should be
up to LGBT people to be able to live the life they choose to live. I believe they should be allowed to have the
same rights as heterosexual couples. The
available evidence is that ex-gay conversions do not work and their whole
purpose is to deny and make people feel guilty of their true identity every day
of their life and that is no way to live.
A person who functions as well as a heterosexual person in society, i.e.
can hold down a job and contribute to the wellbeing of society shouldn’t have
to deny who they are.
Christians should not allow these ex-gay groups to be allowed to operate under the Christian banner. It is an utter disgrace. The fact that LGBT people feel they need to have to seek treatment from these people is partly to do with the way they are treated by us in the Christian community.
A letter of apology from former ex-gay Exodus leaders
As former leaders of ex-gay ministries, we apologize to those individuals and families who believed our message that there is something inherently wrong with being gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender. Some who heard our message were compelled to try to change an integral part of themselves, bringing harm to themselves and their families. Although we acted in good faith, we have since witnessed the isolation, shame, fear, and loss of faith that this message creates. We apologize for our part in the message of broken truth we spoke on behalf of Exodus and other organizations.
We call on other former ex-gay leaders to join the healing and reconciliation process by adding their names to this apology.
We encourage current leaders of ex-gay programs to have the courage to evaluate the fruit of their programs. We ask them to consider the long-term effects of their ministry.
Signed
Darlene Bogal, Jeremy Marks, Michael Bussee, Vonnie Pitts, Wendy Lawson, Kim Brett.
More information:
Anything
but Straight: Unmasking the Scandals and Lies
Christian 'Ex-Gays'
Brainwash Thousands
Fortunate
Families – Catholic Families with Lesbian Daughters and Gay Sons
Homosexuality
and Child Sexual Abuse: Science, Religion, and the Slippery Slope
Love Won Out - "Assumptions About What It Means To Be Gay"
Love Won Out - "All Gay People Have Been Sexually Violated?"
Love Won Out - "Advice Given To Parents"
Love Won Out - "If I Pray Hard Enough I Can Change My Child"
Love Won Out – “Gays Like me
exist”
Love Won Out - "Mike
Haley - The Hope Of Marriage"
Beyond Ex-Gay – A website for those who have
survived the ex-gay experience
Apology Statements from
former Exodus ex-gay leaders
Ex-Gay Survivor Eric - P2 -
The Ex-Gay Program
Ex-Gay Survivor Eric - P3 -
Isolation and Exclusion
Ex-Gay Survivor Eric - P4 -
Side X Culture
Ex-Gay Survivor Eric - Bonus
Q&A
Thanks for taking the time to read this post, it will be the last 'long and serious' post for a while.
Chezza :-)
Comments
Chezza, normally when I see that a bog is this long, I don't read it, I skim a little here and there and move on. Your bog embrassed me with all the quotes from the bible and your logic over powered me. All you've written so well, is exactually how I feel. It is so illogical to me that Christ would have condemned gays for living a life loving their mates. Christ was all about love and tolerence not hate and bigotry.
I have several gay friends some male and some female and I feel for them as they struggle to be in this very anti-gay environment. In Dancing Bear's blog this week he spoke of the mean and hateful words spoken by the new Pope, against gay marriage. Bear speculates that the Pope is a closet homosexual. We have read recent headlines of Christian leadership and US Senators engaged in homosexual relationships.
One thing that I don't believe you mentioned is that some people, I'd say mostly men, come out against gays because they want to have others believe that their protest prove they aren't gay.
The whole anit-gay movement is so sad and such a misplaced use of time and energy. Christ preached love, peace and tolerence, today our religions preach, hate, war and bigotry...hmm I think if Christ back back to this world he would be very disappointed.
As a coincidence I was just reading what the Pope had to say recently and I was thinking well it seems I have to make an addition to my post. I will be totally honest, I am fuming about what the Pope has said. There is no way that committed gay relationships are a danger to world peace, what an totally absurd thing to say and yes extremely hateful. He should listen to his own words:
He actually got this part right, the unfortunate part is that he doesn't include LGBT people in his "human family", well if he does he has a strange way of showing it!
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSL0162664620080101
Yes ye who protests the most has the most to hide - I agree this is quite often the case in many different situations.
If Christ came back today I would hope he would be disappointed otherwise I would be disappointed.
Thanks heaps for the positive comment.
hmmm...
IMO, the bible is a wee bit out-dated...
and why the heck can't people let other people just live their lives
REALLY!
Yeah I know..........
*Huge sigh*
Says it all, doesn't it.
You say it all so well, thank you !!
I would just like to add to the gay argument, the bible says love thy neighbour !
I don't ask straight people what they do in their bedroom and I am sure some would shock me, but that is their choice.
What I do in mine is my choice, it doesn't change my desire to treat people with respect and live my life by morals I hold dearly.
I just love another who happens to be the same sex as I.
As for this .. and is caused by a mother who was close, controlling and overbearing; they quote a figure of this occurring in 87% of gay people....
This argument is just as stupid as saying I have a choice..why would I chose to be different, to have my love belittled all my life and live a life that is considered immoral and deviant...
Thank You again Chezza for your understanding and tolerance and desire to show that gays are just as normal as heterosexuals are.
I just saw you posted this on Facebook and thought I'd have a bit of a read. It is an intresting debate.
First of all I agree with you on the point that Christans can't pick and choose which bits of the Old Testament (or Jewish Law) they can follow. In fact they don't have to pick or choose. As a general rule, if we see a Christian write saying to keep it up, then do so, if not or they reject it (as with circumcision etc) then leave it. Much of the Old Testament Law exists to show Christians just how much harder life would be without Jesus. (PS you left out Sodom and Gomorrah).
Also that you have highlighted, the Bible only deals with sexual acts, not orientation and that they are a very small component of the overall work. Cultural priorites have changed, however, we are a very sexualised society now. So if God had waited until now to reveal his wisdom, it might have been covered a bit more extensivly and prescriptively although that's not to say that what is covered is any way incomplete for what we need to live a holy life.
Also as a feminist (but also a Christian) I take issue with leaning too heavily on Old Testament ideas as women are little better than property - a reflection on the society at the time rather than God, fortuantely.
Additionally, it's important to note that guidance regarding behaivour in the New Testament is for Christians only. It can not be applied to those outside the chruch - so a Christian who openly condemns or discriminates against an openly gay person who does not claim to be a Christian, is in fact sinning. And God doesn't say one sin is better or worse than another, they all seprate us from him.
I have to say, I have a tendancy to side with Paul, in many cases he just articulated better or elaborated on what Christ had already taught. And if we look at the example of Jesus, he was in fact single. Not all of us are cut out for that sort of life, so Paul does make some concession, and in Timothy actually encourages widows to marry again so that they are not reliant on the church. But those who identify as Christian, do have to make a commitment to follow the beliefs that come with the territory, regardless of social changes. And some of them do suck and completely go against our human nature - but the decision should be made remembering that it's just for the short time we're on earth, compared to eternity in the after life.
As for the quotes from the APA, it is interesting to note that until recently homosexuality was treated not only as a mental illness, but was also illegal. One of my favourite authors, Oscar Wilde, was imprisoned for consentual homosexual acts just over 100 years ago (not too long in the scheme of things). But any minister or any one claiming to be Christian who relies on secular thinking and treatment to help some one probably needs to be beaten over the head with a Bible until some of it sinks in. They should know very well that they should be relying on Christ to change people, not their own actions and not treatment from any doctors or psychologists or the like!
Anyhow, that was long, I should go and do my own rant.
Funny how churches are so selective in the causes they crusade for, from within their own book. Personally, I'd say enforce it all, or none. The 10 commandments came directly from God (so they love to say) but then even God himself didn't bother to say anything about homosexuals in them, did he?
I really couldn't care less how people did things 2000 + years ago, as ignorant as most people really were at that time.
However, I must disagree with some of the discussion you had with WPG... It is absolutely wrong to assume that everyone who protests hard for their belief is actually hiding something. -Like the Pope being against gay marrage instantly makes him a closet fag. That's a stupid, ignorant and childish thing to say about someone merely because they believe differently.
The biggest problem I see with gay marrage is that divorce courts are full enough as it is. Allowing gay marrages would do nothing but further clog up our already overburdened court system with more frivilous spur-of-the-moment marrages and divorces.
I'm not gay, but I'm also neither pro or anti gay. Personally, this world is so pitifully short on love that all I could say is grab whatever love you can find, and hang on tight.
As to the last comment:
Perhaps if we heterosexuals concentrated more on not marrying badly, and upon actually holding up the vows we make when we do marry than telling the gays how to live their lives, we could unclog the courts and repair family values enough that we wouldn't notice any hypothetical harm they would do with the rights we reserve to ourselves (or being a citizen of the Commonwealth of of Massachusetts, than we used to reserve).
Surely there's something here and there in Scripture that advises us on how to marry better that would be applicable. Again we're back to that notion that Jesus was speaking to us about how we live our lives more than how we should upbraid others for theirs.
Brons