I am sure some one at NASA is saying, "See I told you we should have packed a hammer, but no you wouldn't listen to me, what would I know! We spent $420 million on this machine and we didn't even fit a hammer!"
]]>
To everyone who has wondered where I have been and to all those who have sent me msgs and I haven't got back to you I am very sorry.
Initially I was trying to catch up on some essential paperwork - not even remotely finished yet, but that had to be put on hold and it is still waiting for me.
Then it really all started - there has been family crisis after family crisis.
Just when I thought I would be back here to say hello, Hubby had other plans. He had a heart attack on Tuesday and had to be flown to Melbourne. I followed down by car with our eldest son and we returned on Friday to do things which couldn't be put off. Hubby came back home last night with our 2nd eldest son.
Luckily when the heart attack occurred, we did every thing right and got an ambulance immediately and he was given treatment straight away at our local hospital which dissolved the clot very quickly. So it looks as if damage to the heart is minimal.
His specialist (he has never had a specialist before) said even if Hubby had lived on lettuce for all of his life he still would have had a heart attack, as it appears there is a strong genetic link. Now his brothers and sister need to have stress tests, as does his cousins on his mother's side. Eventually as the children get to around the age of 40, they too will need to be monitored.
We now have to have a his and hers section to our medicine cabinet, as we are now on about an even par with the number of medications we take.
We have been very lucky our family has been there every step of the way and are still helping out at this very moment.
I hope everyone else is doing well.
I always like to post different perspectives on issues, especially when they are voices which are seldom promoted by the mainstream media.
I found this interview with Hamza Yusuf interesting:
Hamza Yusuf
Hanson was born in Washington State and raised in northern California. After
exploring religion at an early age, he entered Islam at 18 and set out to study
in England, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Algeria, and finally
West Africa. He became fluent in the Arabic language and then began his studies
of the traditional Islamic sciences under the tutelage of some of the greatest
Muslim scholars of our age.
After a sojourn of ten years abroad, Hamza Yusuf returned to the U.S. and took
degrees in Nursing and Religious Studies. In 1996, he co-founded the Zaytuna
Institute in order to teach the traditional sciences of Islam to people in the
West. He serves as the director of the Institute and has translated several
texts from Arabic for the Institute's curriculum.
He is recognized today as one of the most influential voices for Islam in the
West and has advised several world leaders including the President of the
United States and the head of the Arab League. Hamza Yusuf resides in northern
California with his wife and children.
The entire interview is interesting, however if you haven't got time to watch it all I would suggest you at least watch the last video in which there is a discussion regarding Islam and other religions.
Brazil's government has released pictures of a previously unseen community of people living in the Amazonian rainforest.
It is believed they have never had previous contact with the outside world.They were located on the border between Brazil and Peru.
The footage was taken from the air by Funai, a Brazilian government foundation, dedicated to the protection of indigenous tribes.
Funai has a policy to not contact tribes similar to this one, and instead try to prevent invasions of their land so they remain autonomous.
But the agency warns the tribe, and others like it believed to be living in the
Amazon, that they are at risk from illegal logging.
After seeing the footage, I do wonder if flying at such a low altitude with a helicopter was the right thing to do. The indigenous people were obviously terrified given they were using their bows and arrows to defend themselves from the helicopter.
I need to blend into the background for a bit as my medical treatment is giving me a bit of a hard time at the moment. So a rest from controversial subjects and lengthy debates is the order of the day, week, month or as long as I can keep my big mouth shut.
Great photo isn’t it. From what I have read up about this photo, it hasn’t been photoshopped and it is an example of some excellent body art.
Now speaking of keeping one’s mouth shut and blending into the background, I wish Hubby’s Mum understood that concept. I had a very embarrassing time at the doctor’s with her yesterday.
I took Hubby's Mum for her 6 monthly check up. Anyway she is deaf and she speaks LOUDLY and she is VERY opinionated, which can be a bad combination in confined areas. So she decided to let lose in the doctor’s waiting room with her opinions on the Australian Government’s apology to the indigenous communities in regards to the “Stolen Generation”.
For those who don’t realise where I live, I do live in a town which has a reasonable population of indigenous people. Also one of the receptionists at the doctors is a lovely lady who has indigenous heritage.
So off goes
Mother in full throttle on a loud tirade about how wrong the PM was to make the
apology, and he needs to recant his apology and say that most of the indigenous
people were saved and not taken. If that was not enough and trust me it was
already well and truly too much, then she starts by stating loudly how she likes
the full blooded aboriginals, but she doesn't like the “part” aboriginals – she
doesn’t even know one aboriginal but anyway she knows!
She went on and on and on.
So what was I doing this whole time, besides looking for the closest exit or a shovel to dig a hole to bury myself in?
Well I was disagreeing with her in the hope people would realise I did not agree with her and they would just take her words as words of an elderly lady, who has lost all sense of tact, and therefore if there were any indigenous people sitting behind us, they wouldn’t become too upset and confront us. I was also praying that the lovely indigenous receptionist was at lunch while all of this was happening. She wasn't on the counter, but later I did see her around at the back of reception. I really hope she wasn’t privy to Mother’s ‘conversation’.
Later on 3 indigenous Aussies did turn up in the waiting room; thank God she had stopped her rant by that stage!
I may have to have a quiet word with her before I take her back to have blood tests and then another time to get the results - I don't want to go through that again. The problem is she won’t remember she has already had this rant with me and she may do it again and again. The other alternative is that someone else can take her. Maybe hubby can take her, given he thought it was a great joke.
Old people they seem to totally lose tact, think no one else can hear them and they KNOW they are right and they are not afraid to tell anyone who they corner!
I do love her though.
My apologies to
any indigenous Aussies for my Mum in-law’s lack of tact and understanding – she
is 90, so I think we shall give her a “Get of Jail Free” card.
Today is Sunday - A day of rest and a day of peace. So no replies to comments today.
What I will post are two articles displaying interfaith dialogue and how it promotes peace. Peace to all.
Have a peaceful Sunday,
Chezz
Muslims, Christians Discuss Faith and Reason in Rome
1st
May 2008
VATICAN
CITY (Zenit) - Benedict XVI was pleased to see representatives of Catholicism
and Islam considering faith and reason in their respective creeds.
A statement from the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue and the Tehran-based Center for Interreligious Dialogue of the Islamic Culture and Relations Organization affirmed the Pope's "great satisfaction" when he received representatives from their groups after the general audience today.
At
the end of the meeting the participants agreed that faith and reason are both
gifts of God to mankind.
They affirmed that faith and reason do not contradict each other, and that
though faith might in some cases be above reason, it is never against it.
"Faith and reason are intrinsically nonviolent," the participants affirmed. "Neither reason nor faith should be used for violence; unfortunately, both of them have been sometimes misused to perpetrate violence. In any case, these events cannot question either reason or faith."
Both
sides agreed to cooperate in promoting genuine religiosity, in particular
spirituality, to encourage respect for symbols considered to be sacred and to
promote moral values.
The participants concluded that Christians and Muslims should go beyond tolerance,
accepting differences, while remaining aware of commonalities and thanking God
for them. "They are called to mutual respect, thereby condemning derision
of religious beliefs," the concluding statement affirmed.
It added: "Generalization should be avoided when speaking of religions.
Differences of confessions within Christianity and Islam [and] diversity of
historical contexts are important factors to be considered.
"Religious traditions cannot be judged on the basis of a single verse or a
passage present in their respective holy books. A holistic vision as well as an
adequate hermeneutical method is necessary for a fair understanding of
them."
The participants expressed their satisfaction with the level of the presentations and the debates, the concluding statement noted, as well as the open and friendly atmosphere during the colloquium.
3rd May 2008
Muslims, Christians and Jews in America already share a commitment to interfaith work characterized over the years as friendly and respectful with tangible results.
For me, this was best demonstrated during the first few days after the Sept. 11 attacks. Two nights after the tragedy, a lone gunman fired at worshippers leaving the Idriss Mosque near Northgate. Mercifully, nobody was hurt.
The next morning, the shooting was a top national news story — ours was one of the first mosques attacked after Sept. 11.
I arrived at the mosque around 6:30 a.m. to speak to the media. Shortly after 7 a.m., the first of many neighbors and citizens began to arrive with flowers, cards and offers to help secure our place of prayer.
Many of these volunteers were from the local interfaith community. They showed up in force offering to guard the mosque. People from the Church Council of Seattle and the interfaith community wound up standing guard day and night. They camped on our doorstep for the next three weeks to protect the city's largest mosque.
We had, over the years, shared coffee and discussions on religion with many of these faith-loving people. But those three weeks in 2001 ushered in a new chapter for our communities.
In the months that followed, we began to feel special trust in our brethren based on action, not just on words. We discovered that risking one's life for another's safety was a shared belief among faiths.
In early Islamic history, Prophet Muhammad drew up a pluralistic constitution that spelled out the duties of Muslims and people of other faiths in the city of Madinah (near Mecca). The people were to protect each other from threats to their security, uphold moral conduct and deal with each other fairly.
Thereafter, tolerance became the rule for non-Muslims living in Islamic lands. Churches and synagogues were protected by Muslims; non-Muslims were free to practice their own faiths.
I am proud the Seattle area interfaith community came together in those uncertain times; nearly seven years later we are a stronger, more trusting and more peaceful community.
Today, our local mosques are recognized religious institutions, and they've become venues for dialogue among all faiths.
By engaging in interfaith dialogue, world religious leaders have the power to usher in a new era of religious cooperation and understanding. Protecting the right of religious freedom and understanding our differences is precious, because our most universal quality is diversity.
Over time, such interfaith efforts carry us toward the day of peaceful brotherhood and sisterhood among all God's children.
In a time of
universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
George Orwell
Imagine a world in which the Children of Abraham were reunited. It would have to be a much nicer and safer place than what it is at the moment. All of the world’s problems would not be solved, but we would be well on the way.
Regrettably we have a long way to go before this will happen. It could happen; there is no doubt about it. Unfortunately we have too many misguided people in the world at the moment who seem to believe fighting is the complete answer to peace. Others seem to believe another solution is to alienate people and restrict their freedoms. To me there seems to be a lot of counter productive solutions to peace.
Here is an
example and this is from people who claim that their religion is one of love and they make claims such as these in regards to what a real Christian is:
"They truly follow the tenets of Jesus. Things like "love your neighbor", "pray for them that despise you and say all manner of evil against you", "do unto others as you would have them do unto you", "if someone slaps you on the left cheek, turn your right cheek to him, also" and "if someone takes your cloak, give to him your tunic, also". Those are Jesus' words, and that is a religion full of love for your fellow man."
Currently here at Vox (thanks to paikea for highlighting this and posting a very interesting article titled: Muslim True/False) there is a petition being promoted to put forward a proposed US Constitutional Amendment. This amendment would include that:
“The preaching of Islam in Mosques, Schools, and other venues is
prohibited. The subject of Islam
may be taught in a post high school academic
environment provided that instruction include discussion of Islam
’s history
of violence, conquest, and its ongoing war on democratic and other non-Islamic
values.”
Yes it does seem rather harsh.
The proposal also states:
“Whereas; the United States of America was founded on the ideals of individual rights, including the individual right to practice one’s religion of choice, or no religion, and that there would be no compulsion of religion, nor state sanctioned religion, nor a ‘religious test’ for participation in the body politic;
Whereas;
Islam includes a complete political and social
structure, encompassed by its religious law, Sharia, that supercedes any civil
law and that Islam
mandates that no secular or democratic
institutions are to be superior to Islamic law;”
From what I can gather about the United States the first paragraph is correct, unless you listen to some of the people from America’s Religious Right and then it seems they would dearly love to change this paragraph. We have all heard about the pillars of the 10 Commandments being set up in public areas on American soil and the big kerfufel that it has caused. If there is no state sanctioned religion, then there should not be the establishment of such a practice. But listen further to a statement from someone who stated they would sign this petition, but had doubts of its effectiveness due to the wording of the petition:
“I think a better possibility to enact an Amendment to the Constitution declaring America a nation with a Judeo-Christian heritage without establishing any particular Jewish sect (Orthodox, Conservative or ) or Christian Denomination (Variations of Protestantism, Catholicism, Eastern Orthodox etc.) as a State religion. This would simultaneously deal with Secular Humanism war on Christianity and radical Islam.”
Now I could be totally wrong, but this statement doesn’t exactly match up with the statement:
“Whereas; the United States of America was founded on the ideals of individual rights, including the individual right to practice one’s religion of choice, or no religion, and that there would be no compulsion of religion, nor state sanctioned religion, nor a ‘religious test’ for participation in the body politic”
Although the comment doesn’t say there should be an official state religion, it does indicate there is intent to restrict freedom of religion and non-religion. Let’s face it if it was possible, the Religious Right would declare the US a Christian nation in an instant if it had the power.
This brings me to the next paragraph I included above,
Whereas;
Islam includes a complete political and social
structure, encompassed by its religious law, Sharia, that supercedes any civil
law and that Islam
mandates that no secular or democratic
institutions are to be superior to Islamic law;”
This may or may not be the case in regards to Islam, however when it come to the Religious Right in the US, what sort of laws would we expect to see in the US. The answer is simple we would see strict laws based on their version of Christianity. To illustrate my point I only need to draw your attention to an article such as this, “God’s Choice for President”. So who would the Religious Right’s God choose to be the next US President, well naturally McCain and why would God do such a thing, only two factors come to mind apparently, the issue of abortion and gay rights – yes that is it, I kid you not! It seems God is not concerned about social justice issues, healthcare, poverty, the environment, racial harmony, equal rights and the endless list of things I thought were major concerns to a “Christian” God.
The Religious Right also seems to need to make up its mind. I have noticed that when it suits, Christianity is described as a religion of peace and then they will do a back flip and bash the more socially conscious Christians over the head with their Bibles and say, "Christianity is not a religion of peace, because Jesus didn’t come to bring peace," and they will then go on and quote the following Bible passage:
“Do not think that I came to bring peace on the earth; I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I came to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; and a man’s enemies will be the members of his household. He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me; and he who loves son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me. And he who does not take his cross and follow after Me is not worthy of Me. He who has found his life will lose it, and he who has lost his life for My sake will find it." (Matthew 10:34-39)
It is an interesting passage. I actually like this passage, for me it means
Jesus came here to shake the people up and get them thinking and get them out
of their selfish and corrupt ways. The church at the time needed a good kick in the pants. The people needed to start doing good work to help others and to become more loving and compassionate. That at least is partly the meaning of the passage if it is read in conjunction with the other messages Jesus conveyed throughout the NT. To me the sword
is not to be taken literally. However, I
have heard Christians use that “sword” to defend the right to carry a gun, go
to war, use violence, justify capital punishment, and a host of other violent acts.
It is interesting how Islam is always
portrayed as being spread by the sword, and yet here we have a quote in the
Christian Bible and it is Jesus who is carrying a sword. So it actually makes sense that when this passage is taken literally it has been used to spread the religion of Christianity throughout the world. At present Islam is conveniently portrayed by Christians as being spread by the sword, and by making that claim they are inferring that Christianity has always been spread peacefully - I guess by some gentle process of osmosis. But this is not true, the correct history of the world indicates otherwise. Christianity has been spread throughout the world by the sword, by the gun, by oppressive tactics and by an endless array of violent actions. In short, Christianity was spread by empire building throughout the world.
I can now refer back to this quote mentioned earlier,
“I think a better possibility to enact an Amendment to the Constitution declaring America a nation with a Judeo-Christian heritage ............. ..... ....... ......"
There is an obvious flaw in this statement, an obvious omission. Who were the people here before the Judeo-Christian heritage was forced upon them? Of course it was the Native Americans, who had their own heritage and their own beliefs systems. Were the Native Americans treated well by their Judeo-Christian conquerors? No, in the main history also proves this to be incorrect.
I am sure that if the Jews, the Moors, the
“witches” and the “sodomites” could have put together a petition outlawing
Christianity during the Spanish Inquisition they would have (So there is no
bias here are two references one a Jewish
perspective another a Catholic
perspective). I have heard modern
day Orthodox Jews speaking of Christianity with utter disdain, and if you watch
the video, “The Hidden Story of Jesus” which I have included below, you will actually witness how much
disdain they have for Christianity and the wrongs they feel Christianity has
done to them.
More from the proposal, “Whereas; Islam preaches that it and it alone is the true
religion”
Of course no other religion has EVER
proclaimed such an audacious statement has it.
I have been told many times that Christianity is the one true religion,
and not only the Religious Right makes that claim. In fact the scripture I quoted above from Matthew essentially says that Jesus is the ONLY way, and if you deviate away from Jesus then your life will be lost. They are powerful words, powerful enough to make parents scared that their children's lives will be lost if they deviate away from the path, and that kind of "terror" can make people do terrible things to other people if they believe another is leading their child astray. It explains why so many Christian parents are devastated to find out their child is gay, for they believe their child is forever forsaken.
I would say that the majority of people belonging to all religions will make similar claims in regards to their religion being the one true way. It stands to reason; otherwise they wouldn’t practice the religion. But it shouldn't mean we shouldn't be able to get along.
Now for me the past is the past. Terrible things have been done throughout history in the name of religion and also in the name of various political ideologies. I have only brought up the past because some seem to like to bring up the past as a weapon against various religions, and my point is to say that no religion has an innocent past. What matters to me is the present and the future, so I would love to move on.
This is my opinion for what it is worth. I believe the Muslims who are being violent and intolerant in the name of Islam are misguided, as were the Christians/Jews/Hindus and other belief systems of the past who were violent and as are the Christians/Jews/Hindus and other belief systems who are violent or intolerant in the present.
This now brings me to the title of this post and that is, "Reuniting the Children of Abraham". This documentary is an interesting look at how it is possible to cross the barriers which impede peace on a personal level. Petitions aimed at oppressing a whole people are not the answer to achieve peace in a country; projects such as these which aim to break down personal barriers to peace are the answer. It is difficult to wage war against a friend or some one you know and respect.
“Abraham, of the Old Testament, was the founding patriarch of a new, monotheistic faith, which included Jews and later Christians and Muslims. One of his two sons is historically tied to the founding of Judaism, the other to the founding of Islam.
The Children of Abraham Project, which is an effort by individuals and interfaith organizations in the Detroit Metro area, to educate Jews, Christians and Muslims as to their common ancestry, and encourages them to work together for tolerance, peace and civic betterment. The process involves watching a play in which teenage actors, some who helped write the play, act out scenes from the Biblical story. This is interspersed with contemporary accounts of religious and ethnic prejudice based on personal recollections. The play has allowed audiences to speak freely about their fears and prejudices and to walk in another's shoes.
The Project is a powerful experience that gives hope to the idea of these three religions being able to find their common heritage as a reason for mutual religious respect and spiritual healing in the future.”
.
.
.
Another interesting documentary is The Hidden Story of Jesus. What really struck me about this documentary was by taking Jesus as an example; it was possible to see how much most of the religions have in common. I believe looking for what we have in common, instead of looking at our differences; will in fact help us to become more closely connected as a society, and more accepting of our differences.
This is not a documentary for Christians to
be afraid of, as I do not believe it would diminish your faith in anyway.
For me personally it actually enhanced my
faith in humanity.
Here are two interesting articles in regards to Islam in Australia:
**Please note since these articles were produced, the Australian Mufti is no longer Sheik Taj el-Din al Hilaly.
ANZAC Day – 25 April – is probably Australia's most important national occasion. It marks the anniversary of the first major military action fought by Australian and New Zealand forces during the First World War. ANZAC stands for Australian and New Zealand Army Corps. The soldiers in those forces quickly became known as ANZACs, and the pride they soon took in that name endures to this day.
When war broke out in 1914 Australia had been a federal commonwealth for only 14 years. The new national government was eager to establish its reputation among the nations of the world. In 1915 Australian and New Zealand soldiers formed part of the allied expedition that set out to capture the Gallipoli peninsula to open the way to the Black Sea for the allied navies. The plan was to capture Constantinople (now Istanbul), the capital of the Ottoman Empire and an ally of Germany. They landed at Gallipoli on 25 April, meeting fierce resistance from the Turkish defenders. What had been planned as a bold stroke to knock Turkey out of the war quickly became a stalemate, and the campaign dragged on for eight months. At the end of 1915 the allied forces were evacuated after both sides had suffered heavy casualties and endured great hardships. Over 8,000 Australian soldiers were killed. News of the landing at Gallipoli made a profound impact on Australians at home and 25 April quickly became the day on which Australians remembered the sacrifice of those who had died in war.
Although the Gallipoli campaign failed in its military objectives of capturing Constantinople and knocking Turkey out of the war, the Australian and New Zealand actions during the campaign bequeathed an intangible but powerful legacy. The creation of what became known as the "ANZAC legend" became an important part of the national identity of both nations. This shaped the ways they viewed both their past and future.
Australians recognise 25 April as an occasion of national commemoration. Commemorative services are held at dawn – the time of the original landing – across the nation. Later in the day, ex-servicemen and women meet and join in marches through the major cities and many smaller centres. Commemorative ceremonies are held at war memorials around the country. It is a day when Australians reflect on the many different meanings of war. (Source)
Today we honour and remember those who have served in the following conflicts:
May those troops currently deployed come home swiftly and safely.
Lest we forget.
In 1998 I was a Venturer Scout (Scouts aged 14 to 17) leader and we took our Venturers down to the ANZAC Day Pde in Melbourne, so that the venturers could help carry the banners for the older diggers. It was a 3 hours drive down to Melbourne and we had to be up at some ungodly hour in the morning to get down there. But it was worth the journey.
Today I managed to watch the Parade on TV and I did see the banner our boys carried 10 years ago. The venturers carried the banner for the Royal Australian Survey Corps.
The Royal Australian Survey Corps began in July 1915 at the Australian Survey Corps. The prefix 'Royal' was added to the title in 1936. The Royal Australian Survey Corps provided charts and maps for training and military operations of the Australian Defence Force. The Corps was disbanded in 1996 and was absorbed into the main section of the Australian Defence Force.